🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts regarding that comments made by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's victory over Taylor Fritz during the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, the commentator is from the US – and sports frequently encourage patriotic sentiment. Some letdown was appropriate. Instead, he invoked the continued absence of US male players at the majors: none of them has won a title since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition.

We all love a narrative, me too. But come on. Suppose Fritz defeated the legend for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was looming in the following match, whom Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him Fritz had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also split the last seven grand slams (plus Alcaraz went on to defeat a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). He stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact preferred his draw, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the top three players in the world back-to-back. Fritz is well justified to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to have faith in themselves. But entering that Djokovic quarter-final who else in their right mind had the lack of US winners on the brain?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the global rankings entering this week’s year-end championships and has secured his previous six encounters over No 3 the German with growing comfort. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that is as high as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a chasm of ranking points away. His elite delivery and powerful power on both front side and reverse side are more than adequate to dispose of the majority of rivals on the professional circuit. When facing the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is frequently overmatched. The past few years has seen the interesting emergence of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless move around with the surprising speed and fluidity of smaller men. Fritz is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he seldom steal a point that the other player was controlling, and playing a soft shot versus him is usually a reliable tactic. That acts as a pretty severe restriction on his upside.

The American has achieved a several dramatic, unexpected advancements throughout his career. At the beginning of the decade, he was circling the bottom of the top 30. 24 months after, he was approaching the elite ten. The previous season, he unexpectedly exploded up to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the next leap, competing against and beating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and including a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What could Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing drought of US male players winning grand slams when Fritz had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the appreciation for the difficulty of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best advancement to the All England Club semi-finals in July.

The American's play in that exact last eight match should have been sufficient of an sign. Djokovic triumphed in four sets, a victory that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a couple championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo appeared well-balanced during the exchanges, with Fritz earning numerous opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic rescued service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the brink of agony. When Fritz finally did convert one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately produced a horrendous service game to lose his own serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a battle secondary to the main contest and forced him to use excessive effort to win it. Down set points in the last game, his first serve sailed to heaven. He prolonged the match two times on his second serve, but finally committed two errors. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, just a result of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The match was fairly ironclad evidence that the American is not good enough to beat any version of Djokovic, who lost to the Spaniard in the following match and never particularly appeared like he thought he could win. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the peak of his athletic abilities anymore, but has developed sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for quite a bit of the decline. The problem is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to prevail, and pressuring him to do so, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he could.

The American is an asset to the tour nonetheless. He’s a patient, reflective voice in press conferences, exceeding almost anyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, prepared to not only express how he feels or the tactic he believed determined a contest, but clarify it. That he should bear the brunt of the blame for America failing to produce a male major champion since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Since Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the standings, maybe they can share that load.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably think about it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” the American informed an interviewer in June of winning a major. I hope he realizes that he’s not a failure if he does not fulfill that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying empire is actually highly improbable for everybody else. {