🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.